How to shoot pinhole photography

No lens!

Pinhole photography is simply that you take the lens off your DSLR or mirrorless camera, and instead block the light from entering where the lens would be mounted, except for a tiny, tiny hole where the light can seep through is very limited amounts.

But why?

Pinhole photography is a nerdy discipline in photography, and certainly not for everyone. It requires long exposures and the images are -due to diffraction – not particularly sharp. But it is a more engaging type of photography, where you will need to spend more time with your camera and you will feel more engaged in the process of shooting, relative to the point-and-shoot like style that most of know from our smartphones..

How?

You need a camera where it is possible to take the lens off. This can be a DSLR or a ML camera, but if you can choose, I would recommend a DSLR, as the sensor is bit better protected behind the mirror than what is the case for a ML camera. You are walking around with a camera with a hole in it after all!

A small hole drilled in the lid used to seal the camera when no lens is mounted.

There are a few different ways you can do this, but I prefer to take the lid you use to seal off the camera when no lens is mounted, and drill a small hole in the centre of the lid. This gives a relatively robust solution, should something hit the area where the lens is usually mounted.

A piece of tinfoil taped to the lid. and a small hole punched in the tinfoil.

Make sure the hole is free from any fragments from the drilling process, so the hole is clean and round. Next, mount a piece of tinfoil on the lid, using a bit of tape. Smart people use tape that is not transparent – from the image above you can see that I am not in that group! And finally, you simply need to take a needle and punch a hole in the tinfoil.

If you want to be very serious about it, you can take a black permanent marker and color the tinfoil black on the side that faces the camera. This way, you minimize reflections on the “inside” of the tinfoil. Needless to say, you need to do this before taping the tinfoil to the lid.

After that, it is simply a question of mounting the lid on the camera, and you are all set! One small thing missing: blocking the viewfinder!

The viewfinder on the Nikon D4 can be blocked by moving a switch to the left of the viewfinder. Here it is closed – no light will enter!

When you are shooting with long exposures, so called false light can enter the camera via the viewfinder, so you need to block it. On some cameras it can be done by flipping a switch next to the viewfinder, if that is not the case for your camera, then you need to block it manually – but please don’t use chewing gum! Yes, seriously, I have seen some photographers do that!

A tripod is (almost) mandatory

Not everyone likes a tripod, but it is necessary to hold the camera still during long exposures. If you don’t have a tripod, try putting the camera on a big stone or a solid fence or whatever is available to you, to secure the camera is still during the exposure.

In my experience, the exposure times for a small pinhole is something along these lines:

  • Shooting into the sun: 10 seconds
  • Shooting on an overcast day: 20-30 seconds
  • Shooting at dusk: around 2 minutes
  • Shooting at night: 4+ minutes

I always try to shoot at base ISO, typically 100, but it may vary subject to your camera. If you shoot at higher ISO, the result may be noisy. I will say though that shooting at night will require so long exposures that in those cases I shoot at ISO 400 or 800 simply because my patience does not suffice. But as a general rule, stay at base ISO.

The auto white balance (WB) will struggle to read the light as there is so little of it, and it may be a good idea to set the WB manually. If you shoot RAW, then you can fix this in post, but I try to get my images right in camera as much as possible, and if you like that as well, the manual WB is the way to go.

As there is no lens mounted, you don’t have to worry about the aperture! My guess is that you are shooting at around f/200 – you can do a lot of math to figure this out; I don’t really care. I don’t need to know the exact aperture, and I simply take a few test shots to figure out what a reasonably right exposure time is.

Bulb may be required

It differs from camera to camera, but when you need your shutter to be open for a long time, the camera may not have a pre-defined option for say keeping the shutter open for 1 or 2 minutes. My Nikon D4 stops at 30 seconds, after that, I need to use bulb mode. That means holding down the shutter while the exposure is going on, which I find to be a pain.

A cabled remote release for the Nikon D4.

So I have bought a remote release, that gives me more options for long exposures than what the camera does.

If you don’t have a remote release or don’t want one, a workaround is to use multiple exposures. Say you ask your camera to expose the same image 5 times. And you set it up to expose each image for 20 seconds. Then the totality of that is a 100 seconds exposure. Only downside is that you will need to hit the shutter 5 times, but it is better than holding it down for 100 seconds, if you ask me.

Is it for you?

In pinhole photography, you are running around with a camera with a hole in it, and that is an invite for dust and dirt to enter. So if you don’t like to clean your sensor, then you probably wanna stay clear of pinhole photography.

Pinhole photography is for long exposures. You cannot shoot anything that moves fast like a cat or a bird in flight. It is mainly for landscapes and stilleben and that kind of images.

Woodland. Notice the almost infinite DOF and that nothing is particularly sharp.

But it is a very engaging style of shooting, you cannot see in the viewfinder what the camera will capture prior to hitting the shutter, so there is a bit of guessing and trial-and-error when it comes to pinhole photography. And that has a charm. But it may not charm everyone!

 

 

Which photography Youtube channels to follow?

Learning from YouTube

You can learn a lot about photography watching YouTube videos. But granted, the number of channels and number of videos is overwhelming and being new to photography it can be difficult to know where to start and what to prioritise. That is the aim of this post: to give you some anchor points regarding photography and YouTube. It is just my list, and I don’t claim it is fair or comprehensive – my hope is that you can use it as a starting point and grow your own list from there.

Daniel Norton – portraits and light

If there is one photographer that really knows about portrait photography and especially all aspects of lightning (flash, fill, etc), then it is Daniel Norton. When it comes to lighting, he is my guru. Period.

Daniel is a NY based photographer who has been a very successful photographer in the fashion industry, but now is more focused on teaching, both via his YouTube channel and his podcast over at Avoice. He also co-operates with Adorama, so often his videos are published under the Adorama brand, but you can also find videos that he publishes on his own channel. And of course he has both his own homepage and is on Instagram. His podcast is different from the videos in the sense that it “discuss what it means to be a creator in today’s content rich world” (quote from the podcast).

Marten Heilbron – reviews

Marten Heilbron is a YouTuber proving that to be successful you don’t need to be young and make fast paced videos, as long as your content is competent and relevant. And his channel certainly is. He describes his own channel as “detailed hands-on reviews, explanations and demonstrations of cameras. Here you will find honest and detailed camera reviews, along with some how-to videos and the occasional travel review.” – and it is a very precise description of his channel and its contribution. And then Marten always has that bit of humor and twinkle in the eye that adds an extra dimension to watching his videos. So look no further if you want a camera review and a camera demonstration in one go.

Tech Gear Talk

If you want to watch some of the best produced and most “delicious” reviews on Youtube, the channel Tech Gear Talk is worth a visit. He reviews a lot of non-photography items as well, such as smartphones and the like, so the channel is wider than “just” photography gear. His motto is “Buy it Nice or Buy it Twice” and it may not always be good for your wallet, but he certainly has a point!

Kai W – reviews

The reviews from Kai W almost could not be further away from the ones Marten Heilbron gives. Kais’s videos are made by the same small team and have a crazy or desperate angle, as if he really really does not want to do the reviews at all. I get the impression that he finds it a bit boring and therefore he tries to escape out of the traditional frames for review videos using crazy ideas or storylines in the videos. I often find that his conclusions (the last 20-30 seconds of the video) is where he gets serious. So pay attention to the very last words in his videos – this is where the good and serious assess-ment of the gear under review is to be found.

Steve Perry – wildlife

If you want to know a thing or two about both wildlife photography and how to make the most of your Nikon camera, look no further than to Steve Perry’ channel. He talks fast and his videos are packed with information, but always relevant and based on facts and experience. And what I really like: he often presents evidence rather than just making a claim.

Sean Tucker – creative process

If you are looking for lens and camera reviews, then the channel from Sean Tucker is NOT for you. He has a very different focus, more aimed at the process of being creative and why we do it. He does have some videos that address the “how-to”  side of photography, but he is never into the details of a certain camera or a certain lens; he’s channel is gear agnostic. His videos often start and ends with some very beautiful footage in slow motion with accompanying music, and in between he talks and debates on a certain subject. It is one of those channels that I return to again and again, maybe because I like the philosophical aura that seeps through each well made video.

Jamie Windsor – history

Jamie’s channel may to some be a bit in the same league as Sean Tucker, but I find him slightly less philosophical and a bit more towards the “how-to” side of photography. What I really like about his channel is that you can tell he has years and years of experience and he happily shares this with his viewers. Also, he often tells the story or the history behind a certain concept or hot topic.

Christopher Frost – Lenses

If you want a short focused lens review, this is the channel to go to. Christopher has specialized in lens reviews and often uses the same “template” for the videos so you know what to expect and secures that all the vitals are covered. And he has a calm voice and well paced way of presenting the lenses and their performance, which makes the videos a pleasure to watch relative to some of the more “noisy” channels.

Mike Browne – Learning photography

If you want to learn photography from a guy who you can tell loves to teach and share knowledge, then look no further than Mike Browne. This is probably one of the channels where I have learned the most about photography and basic concepts such as aperture and dept-of-field and how that impacts your images. If you listen carefully, you will find that he not only addresses the “how-to” part but also often talks about how to get “in the zone” of seeing great images long before you lift the camera.

Omar Gonzales – Fuji and entertainment

If you want to have a laugh and be entertained while still learning a lot about especially Fuji, look no further than the brilliant channel from Omar Gonzales. If you want to know him a bit better, paying a visit to his homepage is a way to do it. He claims to be camera agnostic, but I learned a lot about especially Fuji cameras and lenses from watching his videos. He is not a full time youtuber but has a portrait and event business.

James Popsys – Entertaining learning

James Popsys has a special relationship with sheep and that is one major reason to watch his channel! Another is that you learn a lot about photography and he has a great sense of humor and irony that makes watching his videos a true pleasure. And he puts a lot of thinking and perspective into his videos that you do not find with many other channels.

 

 

 

Review: Viltrox Ninja 10B LED light

Let there be light!

Some say that photography is writing with light, and as such the right light is more important than anything else! Here the Ninja 10B LED light from Viltrox comes in handy. It was kindly sent to me by Viltrox for review, but the review here is by me and not Viltrox.

Some prefer flash light in a studio, but for video that is not of much use and also steady light has the advantage that you can see how the light hits your subject(s) before you start shooting or recording; you don’t have that convenience when shooting with flash. In that sense there are many advantages to using steady light over flash light.

Viltrox Ninja 10B LED light
The Viltrox Ninja 10B. Here with the lamp cover mounted (yellow triangle in the centre). On the side you see the green handle bar for angle adjustment. At the bottom the handle for hand holding the lamp.

The Viltrox Ninja 10B comes in several variants, and if you want to go mobile say because you shoot outdoors, you should definitely take a closer look at the options with battery supplied over at the Viltrox homepage.

In the box

In the box the main items is the light itself, a reflector (Bowens interface) and a power supply – and it is all delivered in a nice little bag for easy storage and travel. There is also a lamp cover that protects the LED lights during transport – it is important that you remember to always put to cover back on the light during transport so the LED panel is not exposed to dust or hit by anything.

My copy came with a handle to use the light handheld. Weighing less than 500 grams, handheld is a good option, although I often mount my light on a stand.

Viltrox Ninja 10B LED light
The adapter retaining clip keeps the power supply at bay.

A really useful item is the so called adapter retaining clip, that allows you to secure the power supply to the stand, so it is not hanging in the power cable on the rear of the light. It may sound like a small thing, but when you first get used to this adapter, you wonder how you could do without it!

Viltrox Ninja 10B LED light
A bag is in the box. Nice for both carrying the light and storing at home.

The light is delivered in a nice bag that you can use for both transportation and storage.

The light

The light is a 120 watts (!) LED light with a color rendition index above 95, which is bound to give you precise colors at any color temperature. The kelvin values ranges from 2800K to 6800K.

Viltrox Ninja 10B LED light
120 Watts at your disposal!

My current studio light is around 100 Watts and I have never felt that 100 Watts was too little, so 120 Watts is more than sufficient if you like me work in a small studio.

Viltrox Ninja 10B LED light
Viltrox Ninja 10B LED light rear controls.

Controls

Other than the on-off switch, the control that you will use the most is the big dial on the rear of the Ninja 10B: Turn it to control the brightness of the light (0-100%) and push it once to switch to control the color temperature (2800K to 6800K). Push it again to switch back to brightness control. A nice clear LCD on the rear will show you your selections.

You have 19 channels and 6 groups (A-F) to choose from, so I don’t think you will run out of options for finding an available combination.

Remote control

You can buy a remote control as an additional item – it is not supplied with the light by default. But I doubt you will miss the remote because Viltrox has an app to control the light entirely. Download the app, and you have a remote control at your disposal!

The number of options and details you can control with the app is much better than what the controls on the rear of the light offers, so I quickly got in the habit of using the app for controlling the light. If you like to have many pre-defined options to choose from, then you will love the app: you can choose between pre-defined scenes such as a campfire, an ambulance, candlelight, etc

Viltrox Ninja 10B LED light
The app right is a fine alternative to the physical remote as described on the manual to the left. The physical remote you have to buy seperately.

A cool detail is that the app for this light is exactly the same as for the Weelight light sticks, and it works via bluetooth communications. I don’t know how they do it, but when you download the app, the app and the light is connected automatically. Not setup or connection procedure required! A cool detail is that you can turn the light off using the app!

Price and conclusion

The price of the Viltrox Ninja 10B here in October 2022 is around 330 USD (there is an introduction offer – you can take a closer look at Viltrox homepage to get the details). I think that is a fair price and you get a really good solid light with good build quality.

Viltrox Ninja 10B LED light
The handles carved out in aluminium is a nice touch.

The only issue I can find with this light is that the fan is quite loud. Even though it is possible to adjust the fan speed into 3 levels (50%, 80% and 100%), it did not really change the fan speed, and the fan kept on going when the light was dimmed down to 0% or I had turned off the light via the app. For video recording, this is an issue, as the fan noise is picked up by the microphones mercilessly and it is difficult to edit out with noise cancellation in post. So you may find that this light is primarily for photography and video where the sound is added later.

Video link

 

Review: Nikon 85mm f/1.8 S lens (for the Nikon Z-mount, full frame)

Introduction

An 85mm lens is the classic focal length for portraiture, but I use it for many other purposes. If you are in the market for an 85mm prime, this could be your lens, but let me start with five cons before we get to the pros.

Price

First, this lens is not cheap. It may be because I am used to all the budget friendly high quality NIKKOR vintage lens glass, but a price around 670 EUR for my copy February 2022 is to me a lot of money. Here in October 2022, I found a used copy over at MPB for 650 EUR and Amazon offers a new copy for around 700 USD. Btw, this day and age the Dollar and the Euro is about the same.

Speed

Secondly, this lens is not super-fast. At 1.8 you may want more, say f/1.4 or f/1.2 and here we are in personal preference territory. I will say that I find that I can get a lot of background blur even when the subject and the background are close. But if you need a faster lens than 1.8, then obviously this is not the lens for you.

Appearance and Features

Third, if the look and feel of the lens is important to you, then this lens may disappoint, especially if you are used to the vintage lenses – all metal, all glass, made in Japan. This lens is not bad in terms of build quality or appearance, but I think many will find it a bit boring, like sticking your tung out the window; it doesn’t really taste of anything.

The switch from autofocus to manual focus
The switch from autofocus to manual focus

There is a switch to move between manual and automatic focus plus a large configurable control ring, but other than that the lens is just a black metal tube with a flimsy lens hood made of plastic. That’s it. No golden ring. No programmable buttons. No switch for vibration reduction, as it has none and you must rely on the VR in the camera body. Just a weather sealed black tube.

The front of the 85mm lens
The front of the 85mm lens

Minimum focus distance

Fourth, the minimum focus distance is 0.8 meter which is way too much for me – I want to get closer to my subject. If you are like me, the 105 macro lens is worth a consideration as it has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 meters.

Focus breathing

Finally, if you are a videographer, you may not like the focus breathing this lens has. It is significant. When you move the focal plane, it changes the field of view so much that you avertedly may think that you are working with a zoom lens. This is normally not a problem for photographers, but if you are a videographer, you will not like this “feature”.

Sharpness and contrast

So, why did I then buy the lens anyway? Well, let me say that if there is an academy where they teach lens designers what a MTF chart for an outstanding lens looks like, they could pull out this chart as an example for the students.

Credit: Nikon’s homepage.

But this is not a theoretical example, this is the MTF chart for this lens. This is outstanding performance in terms of both sharpness and contrast. Centre to edge. If you don’t believe me or don’t know what a MTF chart is, see here the words of DXOmark. They test lenses and sensors day in and day out:

“We tested the Nikkor Z 85mm f/1.8 S on the high-resolution Nikon Z7, where the lens combined with the 47 MP sensor achieved a DXOMARK score of 49. This short tele has very high and uniform sharpness at all apertures and ranks as one the best performing NIKKORs in our database.”

Notice especially the last part “one the best performing NIKKORs in our database”

And DXOMar continue: “Overall, this Nikkor lens is a top-tier performer which can rival more expensive models in optical quality.”

This lens is a top performer. Full stop.

Chromatic Aberrations

One of my few party tricks is that I can get any lens to exhibit purple fringing. The reason being that I shoot a lot into the sun. And in high contrast areas almost any lens, especially wide open and in the corners, will yield chromatic aberration. This lens is no exception, but it is by far the best controlled aberrations I have ever seen. Only in the corners was I able to squeeze purple out of it, and you really have to pixel peep to see it.

Chromatic aberrations
Chromatic aberrations are very well controlled

Distortion and vignetting

The lens has very little distortion and vignetting and whatever is there, is automatically corrected. You need to switch off the correction in post in order to see it. I doubt you will shoot architecture with an 85mm lens, but if you do, I doubt distortion and vignetting will be an issue for you.

Flare control

Nikon has thrown all its coating technology into this lens, and flare is probably some of the best controlled I have seen in a lens. Videographers love flare and will not like the suppression this lens provides, but as a photographer I am happy with the results this lens yeilds.

Bokeh and sunstars

The lens comes with 9 rounded blades, and I appreciate that rounded blades are necessary to get good bokeh.

Sample bokeh
Sample bokeh

But it comes at a price, the price being the quality of the sun stars. I really don’t like the sun stars this lens produces, but I respect the prioritisation of bokeh for a portrait lens. I wish the lens producers would give us 2 sets of aperture blades – straight and rounded, and a button to select between the two.

Sample sunstar
Sample sunstar

Color rendition

Colour rendition is subjective, and I am in general cautious to comment on this in a lens review. If you in general like the way Nikon lenses renders colours, then this lens will not disappoint you. You could fear that all the coating this lens had would influence the colour rendition, but as far as I can tell, this is not the case.

Sample color rendition
Sample color rendition

Auto focus

The auto focus is both silent and fast – maybe not as fast as you want for a wildlife lens, but for portraiture this is all you need. Nothing is fully silent, but it is very discrete, even when you shoot with continuous focus.

Conclusion

You have probably guessed that I love this lens. And that is the bottom line of this review. I think it shows that the Nikon mirrorless lenses have taken the quality of photography gear to a new level.

A phony salesman once said to me that the product quality lingers on long after the price is forgotten.  I laughed at his pitch back then, but today I must admit he had a point.

Video link

 

Related reading

Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.2 lens for the Nikon APS-C Z-mount

Review: Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 APS-C lens for the Nikon Z-mount

 

How many MP do you need in your camera?

The Megapixel war

Camera producers know that many consumers look to parameters and arguments that are easy to compare. So a camera with a certain amount of megapixels must be inferior to a camera that has double the megapixels, right? That is at least what the producers want you to think, so you buy a new camera or a new smartphone with better technical specs. But it may not necessarily be so that 24MP is better than 12MP. Let me explain why.

The need for MP

You actually need less MP than you think. Obviously, the more MP and the more resolution on your sensor, the more fine grained the image is and all things equal that must be better, right? Yes and no. Notice what you do when you view an image: instinctively you hold it in a distance so you can take in the entire scene. If you hold it too close, then you feel like you are watching a tennis game: your eyes ping pong all over the place, and it does not feel natural.

You can try this with your TV: If you go very close to it, you can probably spot the individual pixels, but as you move away, it all gels together to lines and curves and colors and shades. So the viewing distance is key to determine how much resolution you need. And the further you move away, the less resolution you actually need! I have not tried this, but the rumors has it that a billboard only has 1-2MP!! So the further away, the less resolution you need!

There are however some situations where lots of resolution can be useful.

Cropping

If you often find that you crop a lot in post processing of your images, then obviously the more MP’s you got, the more you can crop and still have an acceptable number of pixels left for the final image. And the more you have to start with, the more likely it is that the final result has sufficient resolution.

Viewing distance

Sometimes your viewers do not hold a natural viewing distance, simply because they use your image in another way than traditionally. For example I often stand in filled trains with – if not billboards – then large adds, and in those cases I get very close to the ads and hence the resolution needs to be good in order for me not to see a lot of unrelated dots. It can also be an exhibition where the audience find it natural first to view your image from a distance, and then go close to the image to study a detail. Also here the viewing distance is the parameter the necessitates lots of pixels.

Post processing

In some cases when you do post processing of your images, and especially where you use one part of a picture to repair or fill in another part of the image, it can be easier to do if the material is more fine grained when you work zoomed in several hundred percent. Again, it is because your post processing work takes an “unnatural” viewing distance.

How much is enough?

I have with my Nikon D700 (12 MP) printed images in size 70×100 cm and the client was very happy with the result. That is how little you need to print large. So if you just want to print large with a viewing distance, then in most cases 12MP will suffice. Also, if what you primarily do is upload your images to social media, it will undergo a lot of compression etc, so you have no benefit of a higher resolution. But, admitted, it seems like the normal resolution for a good enthusiast camera – both APS-C and FF – is around 24 MP.

Any disadvantage to high MP?

The file size will grow with increasing MPs and your hard disk and  computer will feel the weight if you shoot RAW especially. Also, camera shake is more likely, as the fine grained sensors will be super sensitive to even the smallest movements, where there is more forgiveness in a sensor with big and fat pixels. Also, because the light is being hashed up to smaller and smaller units, the exact reading of the amount of light becomes more difficult and precise micro contrast is more difficult to obtain with a high resolution sensor.

Bottom line?

I shoot with anything from 12MP (Nikon D700), 16MP (Nikon D4), 24MP (Nikon Z6ii) to 36MP (Sony A7Rii). And one of my biggest disappointments was to work with the Sony files in LR. I may have had expectations beyond what is reasonable, but I must say that I did not reach the true “nirvana” that I had hoped for.

My experience tells me that it is much more important that you have a great lens that can feed the sensor with the best light possible combined with a sensor able to read the light precisely, than it is to have lots of megapixels. And that is probably why so many photographers in this day and age still hold on the their Nikon D700 coupled with some AI-S glass from back in the days, as it still delivers images with 3D feel and micro contrast far beyond what many more modern and high res sensors can deliver. But it is a complicated message to convey, and not one that makes the marketing headlines easy to make, and hence we will probably continue to see the pixel war continuing for years to come.

 

 

Should you buy a fast lens or not?

To speed or not to speed

There are arguments for and against a fast (or faster lens), and in this short blog I want to go through some of the pro and cons of a fast lens. I will not make a recommendation, as I think the decision is yours as you have to live with the consequences of the choice you make, not me. So I think it is important that the decision stays with the decision maker: you.

Fast versus less fast

One of my favorite lenses: The 135mm DC from Nikkor. Also comes in a 105mm version,

Fast glass is glass that will allow you to go to a small f-stop number i.e. a large aperture. This is also referred to as shooting wide, as the lens’ aperture blades are opening up as wide as they can to make use of all the glass in the lens.  When you have fast glass, the glass will allow you to shoot at fast shutter speeds, as the exposure time can be kept down (= fast) because the lens takes in a lot of light.

There is not absolute definition of what fast glass is, but I would say that from around f/2 and wider (say f/1.4 or f/1.2) we are talking very fast glass. And some glass can go down to f/0.95, but when talking Nikon, I believe their fastest glass is the 50mm f/1.2.

One characteristic of fast glass is that the front glass is BIG, and the longer the lens, the bigger it gets. For a short lens like 24mm, you will probably not notice if the glass is f/2.8 or f/2, but the longer the lens gets, the more “crazy” big the front glass gets. You have probably seen bird or wildlife photographers with long, long lenses and crazy big glass at the far end of the lens. They need all the light they can get to freeze a bird in flight with a fast shutter speed.

Weight and size

This brings me to the first point about fast glass: it is heavy, and you will need to be prepared to carry a significant weight if you want to have fast glass. And the longer the lens, the worse it gets. Secondly, the sad observation is that ONLY when you shoot very wide will you benefit from the glass at the edges of the lens – the rest of the time you only use the center part. So if you shoot wide very seldom, you will carry a lot of glass for some very rare occasions. It may not be worth it, if weight is important to you.

Lens design and image quality

I am no expert on lens design, but I have shot with so many different lenses that I can tell that the wider the lens gets, the more difficult it is for lens designers to maintain the good characteristics you see when you are shooting with middle-of-the-road apertures. Lenses wide open often suffer from being soft overall, being extra soft in the corners and if you shoot into the sun or stark contrast, these lenses also tend to suffer from chromatic aberrations to a significant degree. If you are willing to buy an expensive lens, then the lens designers can mitigate these issues, but – as far as I can tell – there is something that makes a fast lens difficult to design with good control of sharpness and aberrations. You can study the MTF chart of the lens to get an idea about how it performs wide open.

Depth of field

Shooting wide gives a wonderful shallow depth of field, and if that is what you are after, then a fast lens can be wonderful. However, be mindful that depth of field is not only a question of aperture, but also distance to the subject. So you can actually get a shallow depth of field if you (zoom out and) move close to your subject. Of course this may not work if you are shooting with a prime, but try it out and see if moving close to your subject will give you the depth of field you seek. Any macro photographer is suffering the opposite issue: even though they are shooting at say f/22, they are so close to the subject that the depth of field is super shallow anyway!

Shooting with a shallow depth of field can give wonderful background blur.

Better sensors

The world moves forward, we get better and better technology, and the image sensors in cameras are no different. Today they can be “starved” with light and still come out with decent results. I think this is both due to the sensors getting better and better, but also because the noise reduction software in the cameras gets more and more advanced and can do computing that is much more advanced than just 10 years ago.

The camera image sensor, here from the Nikon Z50. In a mirrorless camera the sensor is completely exposed when the lens is removed; on a DSLR the sensor is hidden behind a diagonal glass.

I often shoot at ISO 800 with no problem, and I know that I can go higher. So to some extend a modern sensor can compensate for a lens that does not take in much light. And that is why you will see that more and more new lenses are designed with a not-so-impressive maximum aperture. Lens designers prioritize other factors (weight, size, etc) over the speed of the lens.

Price

As you have probably guessed, the price if a fast lens is high, simply because there is more or larger glass involved. You can get fast glass that is not too pricey, but I ask you to study the MTF charts before you invest! You may find that the lens quality wide open is not what you hoped fore. Many lens producers use the speed of the lens as a marketing tool, and hence the engineers are pressured to design a fast lens with the image quality being second to the speed. So learn how to read an MTF diagram, and study it well before you invest.

 

Psychology

The last thing I want to mention is pure psychology, and maybe not much to do with the images you bring home. But if you can choose between say a f/2.8 lens and a f/4 lens, and you go for the f/4, then every time you come home with an image that suffers from either camera shake or subject blur, you will ask yourself if this was because you did not go with the fastest lens alternative. If you buy the fastest and the best lens of the two, then you have taken out that excuse and know that the issue is due to you and not your gear.

Conclusion

I hope the above was useful. I may just have confused you at a higher level, but I hope you see my point that I really don’t want to make the decision for you. I hope this post has helped you make a (more) informed decision – best of luck!

 

Review: Viltrox adapter for Nikon Z mount

Compatibility

The Viltrox adapter for Nikon Z-mount enables you to use your Nikon F-mount glass with Nikons mirrorless cameras, such as the Nikon Z6 or the Nikon Z50. It is intended to work exactly like the FTZ adapter from Nikon, making it possible for you to use your F-mount glass on a Nikon Z mirrorless camera body.

You need to study the list of compatible lenses carefully, as Viltrox do not promise to support all lenses. Selected lenses from both Nikon, Tamron and Sigma are supported according to Viltrox, but here I have only tested with Nikon lenses on my Nikon Nikon Z6ii with camera body software version 1.3.

It is my impression that Viltrox has put in an effort to make the adapter work with lenses with built in AF motors (AF-S and G), including image stabilization and obviously EXIF information. I have been shooting with the 70-200mm f/2.8 G lens extensively, and it works like a charm. I have also used it with my wide 16-35mm f/4 G ED and although I felt the AF was a tad slower than with the Nikon adapter, it also worked really well (speed of AF with a wide lens is not critical to me).

The Viltrox NF-Z mount adapter.
The Viltrox NF-Z mount adapter. Notice both the USB-C plug bottom left on the adapter and also the button next to it, reserved for future appliances.

However, my older lenses seem to work less well:

  • My good old 135mm AF f/2 Defocus Control lens, I could get the on-camera aperture selection to work.  It was simply stuck at f/1 and did not move no matter how much I turned the front command dial. The Nikon adaptor worked fine with this lens.
  • I got the “FE” message when I used my trusty 28-105mm AF zoom lens despite it being locked at the minimum aperture, but a software update from Viltrox set that straight.

So my conclusion is that the adapter from Viltrox does not have the same wide coverage as the Nikon original in terms of lenses it will work with, and that you should consult the list of compatible lenses carefully before investing.

For the AF lenses that are dependent on a AF motor in the camera body, the autofocus will not work with this adapter, as there is no motor built in. This is the same for both both the Nikon and Viltrox adapter, so no difference between original and copy here.

Build quality

Viltrox and Nikon adapters.
Can you tell the difference? Viltrox left, Nikon original right.

The original FTZ adapter from Nikon and the NF-Z adapter from Viltrox are very similar in built quality. The Viltrox is 146 grams and the Nikon is 131 grams.  Both of them appear very solid and both of them lack a gasket towards the camera side to keep out moist and dust.

Viltrox and Nikon adapters.
Nikon left, Viltrox right.

One of the big differences in terms of appearance is that the Viltrox adapter has a USB-C connector, which enables you to install new software updates in case Nikon releases new software for their camera bodies or lenses, that the Viltrox software needs to adapt to. Also, the Viltrox adapter has a button prepared for future use – right now I don’t think it has a function. So the Viltrox adapter is pretty well equipped to deal with future changes, provided of course that they will continue to develop the software for the adapter.

Price

As far as I can tell, the Viltrox adapter does not do anything more than the Nikon original adapter. In fact it does a little less, as the range of supported lenses is less. However, where the difference kicks in is the price. I will not quote prices as inflation is crazy this day and age, but he Viltrox is easily 30% cheaper than the Nikon original. And for the lenses supported by the spec sheet most likely does exactly the same as the Nikon original. And to me the build quality seem to be on par with the original Nikon. Add to this the fact that the FTZ mark 1 adapter has been difficult to get from new since the release of the FTZ mark 2, then you start so see why the adapter from Viltrox starts to be interesting.

Conclusion

The Viltrox adapter to me seems to be very close to the original from Nikon. The build quality is very much the same and the adapter seems to work well to provide auto focus, image stabilization and all the modern features that say a G-series lens support. And then the price is significantly lower – 30% or more.

So what not to like? Well, I would recommend that you study the spec sheet to see if the lenses that you plan to use with this adapter is covered. It may not be the case. After all, Viltrox are reverse engineering the software to behave like the Nikon equivalent without Nikon providing an open source or insight to the inner workings of the adapter. So it will probably be so that the  lenses and camera bodies supported are less than the original. But then again, if all your lenses are supported, then this may not be important to you and the price differences is worth a serious consideration.

Continue reading “Review: Viltrox adapter for Nikon Z mount”

Review: Weeylite K21 RGB LED Light Stick

Weeylite K21

The Weeelite K21 RGB Light Stick is as the name says simply a stick of light. Not much to report here I thought – it is just a stick of light, but it has a few tricks up its sleeve that won me over after working with it for a few hours.

The Weeylite is here hiding behind the dark vase to the right and used to enhance toe shape of the red vase to the left.

The Weeylite K21 gives around 8W of light, and back in the day when  we had incandescent lamps, this is equivalent of around 75W of light. So it does give a significant amount of light, but of course it is not enough to light up a large studio or the like. But it will be more than enough if you make Youtube videos and want some light close to your face or want it to light up the background to make it more interesting. I have also used the Weeylite for product shoots, where it is brilliant to backlight a product, as the stick is easy to hide.

Not much, or?

Admitted – it doesn’t look like much! It is just a stick of light approximately 25 centimeters long. But there is more than meets the eye!

When you see the product, it does not look like much – it is just a stick of light, where the light (ends excluded) is approximately 25 centimeters long.

A brilliant little detail: The Weeylite K21 has threads in both ends, so you can mount it on a tripod or the like.

But the first thing I notices when unpacking it was the threads in both ends, making it possible to mount the light on a tripod or the like. And even better, the Weeylite K21 is also magnetic(!) so you can mount it on many surfaces with or made of metal.

The Weelite is magnetic! Here I have put in on my computer screen for demonstration.

That is a brilliant little detail, that I only found out by studying the manual. And the manual is short and sweet, just like I like them. And easy to understand. In fact, it is not a manual, more a large piece of paper.

The manual is short and sweet. You will quickly get familiar with the Weeylite K21.

Interface

The Weeylite K21 chargers via USB-C! Brilliant!

The Weeylite holds a battery, so you don’t need to worry about cables or the like when you shoot. And I was glad to see that it charges via USB-C, the new EU standard – brilliant!

If you don’t want to use the app, there is a small LCD screen with a few buttons to control the light settings. Also notice the USB-C charging port.

The interface is very simple: A small LCD screen and 4 buttons. You can of course control the strength of the light between 100% down to 1%, and the color temperature. The four buttons work well and my only complaint is that it would have been nice had the buttons been backlit, as I often work in the dark when applying the light from the Weeylite.

But here is the thing that really won me over with this little product: the app. It is simply brilliant – and you can of course see all the settings on your smartphone via the app, also in the dark. The app is so good that I hardly ever use the buttons on the Weeylite K21 itself.

The app impressed me! It links to the Weeylite K21by itself during installation, and you can control all aspects of the light via the app!

First, the app connected to the Weeylite K21 without me doing anything but downloading the app! Not sure how that works, but it did. And then you can control several lights is channels and groups, just like you know it if you have worked with wireless flashes – brilliant!

And the app gives you so many options for controlling the light that it is a bit crazy. It has pre-set effects like weld, candlelight, flame, TV, weld etc, and you can also configure the lights Kelvin value, saturation, brightness and individual color channels, just to mention a few. It is very impressive. And of course you can turn on and off the light via the flash.

Conclusion

If you are in the market for a small light that you can use for videos or product shoots, then I think you should really consider the Weeylite K21.

It is compact, gives a lot of light, easy to mount via either threads or magnetism and the app to control it is simply brilliant and gives so many options that I think even the most demanding will find their requirements are met.

Product link

Product link

Related reading

Review: Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 APS-C lens for the Nikon Z-mount

 

 

 

Review: Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner

Skeptical!

When it comes to robots that help out in the garden or in the house, I am a bit skeptical. Some years back I had one of the first robot vacuum cleaners that was mass produced, and to make a long story short, it was not a good experience. Also, I have two different robot lawn movers, and that is also a mixed bag of experiences.

Roborock S7
Not all members of your household will be equally happy to bid the Roborock S7 welcome to your household…

So maybe my excitement when it comes to the Roborock S7 is rooted in bad experience with other products. That is hard for me to say. But with that said, the rest of this blog will be one long praise of the Roborock S7, simply because I find that it is a brilliant product at a price point where it delivers value far beyond the retail price of 450 EUR (Denmark, Europe).

What is it?

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
The promise on the tin is spot on.

The Roborock S7 is a vacuum cleaner robot, that also facilitates light cleaning with a wet cloth for hard surfaces. It is smart in the sense that it can see the surface it is cleaning, and for example when it cleans a carpet, the vacuum motor powers up to give max suction.

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
Super systematic approach to vacuuming the room.

It is also very systematic. It first walks the perimeter of the room to find the size and direction, and after that starts cleaning both horizontally and vertically.  It is not like a lawn mower robot that takes pride in doing a random pattern – the Roborock S7 cleans in vertical and horizontal lines as depicted in the image above, taken from the app. You can also see where it has identified legs on the furniture and how it has walked around these obstacles in a circle, making sure to clean very close to these.

Is installation cumbersome?

Installation is easy. You download an app, and connect your smartphone to the WiFi network the Roborock provides. Then the Roborock uses the information provided by the app to log on to your Wifi (it needs the SSID and password) and after that the Roborock logs on to your WiFi network and you can now control the functions via the app. And you can follow the Roborock working via the app as the image above illustrates.

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
The water reservoir sits at the rear of the Roborock. You add water (and maybe cleaner) in the hole to the left. When the reservoir is mounted, the Roborock voice confirms that it is now mounted.

Another thing that makes the Roborock easy to work with is that every time you have done some change, like installing the water container at the rear of the Roborock, it will confirm with a computer voice what you have done. In the beginning I found this a bit annoying, but after a little while I started to appreciate the confirmation that the operation was successful.

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
The dust bin is not big, but if you run the Roborock regularly, then it is not an issue. The filter to the left sits on top of the dust bin and catches all the finer parts of the dust.

The dust bin is accessed via a lid on top of the Roborock. It is easy to pull out and clean, and maybe the only complaint that I have is that it is also relatively small, so it runs full easily. However, after running the Roborock in a room for the first time, the second time picks up very little extra dust. So my take is that if you let the Roborock clean on a regular basis, the small dust bin will not be an issue, simply because there is not much dust to collect.

Does it work in real life?

Yes. First of all, the battery life is good. It can cover a lot of square meters in a single charge. And you can follow the battery percentage left in the app. I did notice that it takes a bit of time for the Roborock to charge, but as it in my case returns to charge when the job is done, this is less of an issue. I have not cleaned areas bigger than 45 square meters at the same time.

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
If you leave small items on the floor, the Roborock will find it and get it “in the machinery”. This will halt operations. Here it is a small cable that I had forgotten on the floor.

The same rules applies for the Roborock as for normal vacuum cleaning: the less items on the floor, the better the Roborock can get the job done. For large furniture like a bed, the Roborock does an excellent job cleaning around the legs very thoroughly. But of course, if you can remove obstacles and e.g. put dining chairs on the table prior to starting the Roborock, then you will get a better result. Also, as the Roborock is very systematic, it will find and pick-up anything that is left on the floor. In the image above, I forgot at small cable on the floor, and it got caught in the rotating parts of the Roborock. This halted operations, and I was notified via the app.

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
The Roborock does not take no for an answer, but keeps challenging “the boundaries”. Here it is working on a doorstep.

It also does cleaning edges really well. It does not only run along a wall or an edge, but constantly tries to “attack” the wall by driving slightly into it, meet its master, give up and go a bit out again, only to repeat the “attack” a bit further down the line. It is very convincing and makes sure the cleaning gets as close to the edges as possible. The Roborock has a small bumper so it can “feel” obstacles before it hits them, so no need to worry that these “attacks” will hurt your walls or furniture. It is gentle, but persistent.

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
The Roborock is low and easily cleans under a bed. Here it is cleaning in the kitchen.

The Roborock is low and easily finds it way under a table, a sofa and a bed. In my kitchen it is too tall to make it all the way under the kitchen cabinets, but it cleans some way under the cabinets (se image above) and does so well.

The little rotating arms at the side of the Roborock finds outside the main cleaning area and “throws” into the middle of the Roborock, that then picks it up there. These arms are prone to be tangled up in hairs and the like, but I find that cleaning them is easy.

Does the cleaning mop work?

Yes, if you don’t expect miracles, i.e. that it looks like you have been scrubbing the surface 100 times with a hard brush. That is not what happens.

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
The cleaning cloth at the bottom rear of the Roborock. The Roborock can lift and lower the plate with the cleaning cloth subject to the surface it detects.

The Roborock simply drags a wet cloth over the floor to wipe it clean. And it of course detects if the surface is a carpet, and lifts the mop.

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
The Roborock cleans using the mop also. It is not as good as you cleaning the floor with a mop, but it does add a nice touch to the experience of a clean room.

The water reservoir is intended to keep the cloth wet during cleaning, but I find it works the best if you start with a wet piece of cloth at the outset, so the water reservoir is only used for “topping up” the moist of the cloth.

How long time to clean?

The largest area I have asked the Roborock to clean is 39 square meters. It took the Roborock 72 minutes to complete the work and the battery level dropped to 53%, starting at fully charged.

Roborock S7 robot vacuum cleaner
The less obstacles, the better cleaning.

As you can ask the Roborock to go to work when you are not at home, the time required to clean your home may be less important. You can help the Roborock cleaning better by removing furniture from the floor. i.e. take small tables and chairs away from the floor by lifting them to higher ground, i.e. a sofa or a table. Pretty much like you would if you were to clean yourself. This will also make the Roborock work a bit faster, as it can get the job done in fewer uninterrupted sweeps across the floor.

Can I recommend the product?

Yes. We bought the Roborock 7 for the summer cottage, but we are seriously considering buying one for the home. It is that good. And it is priced very reasonably, so we are tempted. Think you will be as well.

Related reading

Review: Worx Landroid M700

 

 

Review: Garmin Varia RTL516 Rearview Radar and Taillight

Recommended

To make a long story short: Can I recommend this product? Yes.

Any downsides? Apart from maybe being a bit expensive, the biggest downside is that it is so interesting to watch what the radar tells you, that you may forget to look forward!

What is it?

The Garmin Varia RTL 516 is a taillight and rearview radar in combination. It hence makes you more visible, and also makes it possible for you to see what is coming from behind, without turning your head. This is particularly useful for triathletes that due to their position on the bike have a hard time looking over their shoulder, but it is also very useful for racing bikes, where the same applies, maybe to a lesser extent.

Garmin promises that it will detect cars as far as 140 meters away. I have not tested this claim, but I have tested the product in real life, and I can say that it works very well. I am actually a bit impressed. Even if I was driving on a bike path with parked cars between the bike path and the road, the radar was still able to “see” though the parked cars and identify cars approaching.

What is in the box?

Left to right: Documentation, the box, charging cable, the unit itself and mount solution.

Other than the unit itself, the box contains a charging cable, documentation and some options for mounting the unit to the saddle post. You’ll quickly find the relevant parts for your size and shape of saddle post.

Left to right: User guide, safety instruction, box, charging cable, the rear light itself, and then a range of options for mounting the unit.

Is installation easy?

Yes. You just need to find the right length of rubber band and the best shape for your saddle post, and then you can mount it on your bike in 30 seconds.

The light mounted on my coffee stomper just to illustrate how it works.
The light is locked into position with the twist-and-lock system we know from many other Garmin products. Different options for mounting on more or less aerodynamic saddle posts.

Is pairing easy?

Yes. I used it with my Fenix 5 and just asked my watch to scan for new Bluetooth units nearby. By holding down the on/off button for a few seconds, the radar also starts pairing and 10 seconds later the handshake was complete and the units linked.

Connecting the rear light radar to my Fenix 5 watch was really easy and took no time.
The user guide is wonderfully simple to follow. Lots of illustrations. Very little text.

Is the battery life ok?

Yes. Garmin promises 9 hours, and although I have not tested it to the limit, it is my clear impression that there will be plenty of power on a full charge for most cyclists. Only if you cannot charge between rides, I would imagine the battery could run out. On other news, I was a bit disappointed to see that the charging cable – here in 2022 where EU has decided it is the future standard – is not USB-C.

Charging the unit with the supplied cable. Unfortunately it is not USB-C, but just mini USB.

How is it to use?

I tested the unit on a Fenix 5 watch, and the way it works is that a little bar appears to the right in the screen. It is green when no one is approaching and turns amber and red, subject to how fast and how close those approaching are.

The bar to the right is the radars graphical zone. Here it shows that there are no cars or objects approaching and hence it is colored green = no danger.

Cars approaching are illustrated as little dots that move from the bottom of the bar to the top as they approach. Several dots will appear if you’ve got several cars approaching. And it works really well and I am impressed how it is able to distinguish between objects that you just pass (like a parked car) and objects that are approaching. It is so fascinating to watch, that you may forget entirely to look forward! So be cautious when you start using it!

In the best of worlds I would have had a Garmin product to sit on my handlebar so I would be able to see the graphics easily. But I found that when danger really was high, the Fenix 5 watch vibrated just a bit, to draw my attention to the radar. It works really well, but of course can be a bit stressful until you get used to it.

Conclusion

As you probably have guessed by now, I find this to be a great product, and an invention that potentially could save lives in the traffic. It is a bit expensive, but it works really well and considering what damage it potentially can avoid, I really wished that more cyclists would start using this product.